Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation

By Ram Krishna Shrestha, Jackson Loomis. 2001

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c1b5354aa6d4792107b51dcda45d83f9f4e8fb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Luke Brander
2. Maria Loureiro
3. M. Barrio
4. R. J. Florax
5. P. V. Beukering
6. H. Cesar
7. J. Vermaat
8. Ian J. Bateman

In Social Psychology

1. V. Smith
2. Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
3. Ian J. Bateman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. V. Smith
2. Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
3. Luke Brander
4. R. J. Florax
5. Aynur Alptekin
6. Paul Levine

Citations in the corpus

• Is Meta-Analysis a Noah's Ark for Non-Market Valuation? (2002, methodology): “Here, we discuss two in somewhat more detail – Shrestha and Loomis (2001) and Loomis and White (1996).”
• A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies (2010, background): “, 2008); woodland recreation (Bateman and Jones, 2003; Zandersen and Tol, 2009); endangered species (Loomis and White, 1996) and general outdoor recreation (Smith and Kaoru, 1990; Walsh et al., 1992; Rosenberger and Loomis, 2000; Shrestha and Loomis, 2001).”
• How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers? (2008, unknown): “" Only a few studies have, to our knowledge, investigated the validity and reliability of MA-BT (Santos, 1998; Rosenberger and Loomis, 2000b; Shrestha and Loomis, 2001; 2003; Santos, 2007; Shrestha et al., 2007).”
• Global economic value of shark ecotourism: implications for conservation (2013, methodology): “Several authors have reviewed the methodology, uses and misuses of meta-analysis (e.g. Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2001; Shrestha & Loomis, 2001).”
• The recreational value of coral reefs: A meta-analysis (2007, background): “1999; Woodward and Wui 2000), woodland recreation (Bateman and Jones 2003), biodiversity (Nijkamp and Vindigni 2003), outdoor recreation (Rosenberger and Loomis 2000; Shrestha and Loomis 2001), and urban air pollution (Kaoru and Smith 1995).”
• Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta‐Analysis (2018, unknown): “Carson et al. (1996) and Shrestha and Loomis (2001, 2003), cover these types of works extensively.”
• The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature (2006, background): “This raises the question of the validity of value transfer to policy sites in countries that are not represented in the data (Shrestha and Loomis 2001).”
• Contrasting conventional with multi-level modelling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values. (2003, background): “Urban pollution valuation Smith (1989); Smith and Huang (1993); Smith and Huang (1995); Schwartz (1994); Van den Bergh et al.”