How Scientists Think in the Real World: Implications for Science Education

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Written Discourse in Scientific Communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language (2006, background): “This study was limited to two highly regarded scientists—one in microbiology to allow connections to the work of Chaopricha (1997) and Dunbar (1995, 1999, 2000) in similar disciplines, and the other in climate sciences to expand exploration into another hybrid and controversial discipline.”
Selection, Constraints, and Creativity Case Studies: Max Beckmann and Philip Guston (2005, unknown): “Collaborated on work projects (Dunbar, 2000)”