CUMULATIVE DISADVANTAGE: EXAMINING RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITY IN PROSECUTION AND SENTENCING†

By B. Kutateladze, Nancy R. Andiloro, Brian David Johnson, C. Spohn. 2014

408 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ed9dd85acdb81bf2d6d4e1ba868122eeea2c1b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Law

1. S. Bushway
2. Jeffery T. Ulmer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Alix S. Winter
2. A. Redlich
3. S. Bushway
4. Matthew Clair
5. R. Norris
6. Jeffery T. Ulmer
7. D. Mears

Citations in the corpus

• HOW JUDGES THINK ABOUT RACIAL DISPARITIES: SITUATIONAL DECISION‐MAKING IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM* (2016, background): “Furthermore, instead of focusing almost exclusively on the sentencing stage as prior research has done, it is important to consider judges’ understandings of racial disparities at each stage of the criminal trial process (Kutateladze et al., 2014) at which their decisions, either directly or indirec”
• AN EXPLICIT TEST OF PLEA BARGAINING IN THE “SHADOW OF THE TRIAL”† (2014, background): “…scholars have been making new attempts to secure the kinds of rich data that will allow for more fully specified models of the sentencing process (e.g., Kutateladze, Andiloro, and Johnson, 2014; Kutateladze et al., 2014), detailed data on preconviction processes have been difficult to collect.”