D. Steffensmeier

Sociology and Political Science · 2000–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 42 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom D. Steffensmeier trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. C. Spohn
  2. Stephen Demuth
  3. Jeffery T. Ulmer
  4. Sean F. Reardon
  5. Brian David Johnson
  6. D. Massey
  7. J. Kramer
  8. J. Archer
  9. Dana L. Haynie

Who trusts D. Steffensmeier overall

  1. Jeffery T. Ulmer
  2. Tina L. Freiburger
  3. Kareem L. Jordan
  4. Traci Schlesinger
  5. Xia Wang
  6. Stephen Demuth
  7. Ben Feldmeyer
  8. D. Mears
  9. Brian David Johnson
  10. Noelle E. Fearn

Papers from D. Steffensmeier's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers D. Steffensmeier trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? (American Sociological Review)
  2. RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN SENTENCING DEPARTURES ACROSS MODES OF CONVICTION
  3. ETHNICITY AND JUDGES' SENTENCING DECISIONS: HISPANIC‐BLACK‐WHITE COMPARISONS
  4. DOWNWARD DEPARTURES FOR SERIOUS VIOLENT OFFENDERS: LOCAL COURT “CORRECTIONS” TO PENNSYLVANIA'S SENTENCING GUIDELINES*
  5. RACIAL AND ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISIONS AND OUTCOMES: A COMPARISON OF HISPANIC, BLACK, AND WHITE FELONY ARRESTEES*
  6. IMAGES OF DANGER AND CULPABILITY: RACIAL STEREOTYPING, CASE PROCESSING, AND CRIMINAL SENTENCING*
  7. MODELING THE EFFECTS OF LEGALLY RELEVANT AND EXTRALEGAL FACTORS UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE RULES HAVE CHANGED
  8. Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research
  9. TRENDS IN THE GENDER GAP IN VIOLENCE: REEVALUATING NCVS AND OTHER EVIDENCE*
  10. 2. Measures of Multigroup Segregation

Their papers