Trial Penalties in Federal Sentencing: Extra‐Guidelines Factors and District Variation

By Jeffery T. Ulmer, James Eisenstein, Brian David Johnson. 2010

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/260aae9f072bccdb33f48c897736e8bc9117d6e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Wooldredge
2. Jeffery T. Ulmer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jeffery T. Ulmer
2. J. Wooldredge
3. Eric P. Baumer
4. Brian David Johnson
5. Benjamin M Steiner
6. D. Mears
7. Xia Wang

Citations in the corpus

• Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research (2012, background): “As noted, data on pre-conviction outcomes have been hard to come by, but one alternative when they are not available is to survey court community actors on their case processing practices, decision-making considerations, and perceptions of the court community context (for examples how such data can ”
• Distinguishing Race Effects on Pre-Trial Release and Sentencing Decisions (2012, background): “Studies of earlier stages of case processing have grown since the mid-1980s but remain relatively rare (e.g., Albonetti, 1989, 1990; Crutchfield, Bridges, & Pitchford, 1994; Demuth, 2003; Demuth & Steffensmeier, 2004; Katz & Spohn, 1995; Holmes, Hosch, Daudistel, Perez, & Graves, 1996; Kingsnorth, M”