Günter P. Wagner

Genetics · 1996–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 36 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Günter P. Wagner trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. John R. Koza
  2. J. Levinton
  3. John H. Holland
  4. Herbert A. Simon
  5. Thomas F. Hansen
  6. Lee Altenberg
  7. A. Burt
  8. David E. Goldberg
  9. M. West-Eberhard
  10. Scott F. Gilbert

Who trusts Günter P. Wagner overall

  1. C. Klingenberg
  2. Thomas F. Hansen
  3. Kevin N. Laland
  4. M. Pigliucci
  5. Simon P. Blomberg
  6. C. Murren
  7. Alan C. Love
  8. Jeff Clune
  9. C. Pélabon
  10. J. A. Holliday

Papers from Günter P. Wagner's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Günter P. Wagner trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes (Nature)
  2. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest (Nature)
  3. Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters (Journal of Evolutionary Biology)
  4. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry (Nature)
  5. Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  6. Waddington's canalization revisited: Developmental stability and evolution (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  7. Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics (Nature reviews genetics)
  8. A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Nature)
  9. Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability
  10. The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)

Their papers