Stephen W. Michael

Social Psychology · 2013–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Social Psychology — 21 citations into it

Whom Stephen W. Michael trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. G. Gudjonsson
2. Christian A. Meissner
3. A. Memon

Who trusts Stephen W. Michael overall

1. Aldert Vrij

Papers from Stephen W. Michael's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Stephen W. Michael trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The psychology of interrogations and confessions
2. Paraverbal indicators of deception: a meta‐analytic synthesis
3. Practical Meta-Analysis
4. The role of confirmation bias in suspect interviews: A systematic evaluation
5. The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years.
6. Innocent But Proven Guilty: Eliciting Internalized False Confessions Using Doctored-Video Evidence
7. Police Interrogations and False Confessions: Current Research, Practice, and Policy Recommendations
8. Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis.
9. The efficacy of the appropriate adult safeguard during police interviewing
10. Criminal versus HUMINT Interrogations: The Importance of Psychological Science to Improving Interrogative Practice

Their papers

• Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool (2013) — 96 citations
• Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review (2014) — 181 citations