Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool

By Jacqueline R. Evans, Stephen W. Michael, Christian A. Meissner, S. Brandon. 2013

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9efb7ccfe09c3c161b169928deb1d46899a2a575

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Fisher
2. H. Blank
3. Aldert Vrij
4. Maria Hartwig
5. Leanne ten Brinke
6. S. Porter
7. Sharon Leal
8. Siegfried L. Sporer

In Social Psychology

1. R. Fisher
2. Aldert Vrij
3. H. Blank
4. Maria Hartwig
5. S. Porter
6. Leanne ten Brinke
7. Pär Anders Granhag
8. Leif A. Strömwall

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Fisher
2. H. Blank
3. Aldert Vrij
4. Maria Hartwig
5. Pär Anders Granhag
6. Leif A. Strömwall

Citations in the corpus

• A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta‐analysis (2017, background): “…larger indicated heterogeneity of the lie detection effect sizes in the d-based analysis, which is turn a consequence of the fact that one study (Evans et al., 2013) is an extreme outlier in thed-based analysis, but only amild outlier in the odds ratio-based approach (which is whywe decided to…”