Paraverbal indicators of deception: a meta‐analytic synthesis

By Siegfried L. Sporer, B. Schwandt. 2006

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d52bd47773e4137ec9d38c1f460be1ad107bed90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Just tell us what happened to you: autobiographical memory and seeking asylum (2012, background): “While professionals who have to deal with (potential) deception as part of their job feel confident that their skills at detecting lies are fairly good, research suggests otherwise (Sporer & Schwandt, 2006) and this extends to the asylum process.”
‘Look into my eyes’: can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? (2010, background): “Sporer and Schwandt (2006, 2007) presented a working memory model of lying that is broader than Walczyk’s model. For example, apart from reconstruction of the lie, their model includes that liars will attempt to regulate their behaviour. They reported that liars’ tendency to decrease their hand, foo”
The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception? (2010, background): “Further, liars are more likely than truth-tellers to repeat words, phrases, and details (DePaulo et al., 2003; Porter, Yuille, & Lehman, 1999; Sporer & Schwandt, 2006).”
Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review (2014, background): “…determination of guilt is a reliance on non-verbal behavioral cues and analyses of linguistic and paralinguistic styles that are believed to indicate deception, but which consistently have been found by scientific methods to be unreliable (see DePaulo et al. 2003; Sporer and Schwandt 2006, 2007).”
Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. (2007, methodology): “…have argued that encoding a deceptive message requires a greater cognitive effort than telling the truth because of higher processing capacity demands (Köhnken, 1990; Miller & Stiff, 1993; Sporer & Schwandt, 2006; Sporer & Zander, 2001; Vrij, 2000; Zuckerman, DePaulo, & Rosenthal, 1981).”
Interviewing to detect deception (2014, background): “Sporer and Schwandt (2006) introduced a cognitive load/ working memory theoretical model of deception.”