Innocent But Proven Guilty: Eliciting Internalized False Confessions Using Doctored-Video Evidence

By Robert A. Nash, Kimberley A. Wade. 2009

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6891cd026cedc0232657d47e653bb973744491ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. A. Redlich
2. S. Brandon
3. Sujeeta Bhatt
4. Jacqueline R. Evans
5. Stephen W. Michael
6. Christian A. Meissner
7. C. Camilletti
8. Aldert Vrij

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Redlich
2. Christian A. Meissner
3. S. Brandon

Citations in the corpus

• Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review (2014, background): “The nine excluded studies were: Abboud et al. (2002), Beune et al. (2009; see also Beune 2009), Forrest et al. (2006), Horgan et al. (2012), Horselenberg et al. (2003), Kebbell and Daniels (2006), Kebbell et al. (2006), Klaver et al. (2008), Nash and Wade (2009), and van Bergen et al. (2008).”