Police Interrogations and False Confessions: Current Research, Practice, and Policy Recommendations

By G. Lassiter, Christian A. Meissner. 2012

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da4d21c175b5f03ff40447145b412d3175556fce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. A. Redlich
2. Christian A. Meissner
3. Stephen W. Michael
4. Sujeeta Bhatt
5. S. Brandon
6. Jacqueline R. Evans
7. C. Camilletti
8. Aldert Vrij

Citations in the corpus

• Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review (2014, methodology): “In contrast, the information-gathering method of interviewing is typified by practices in England and Wales where, because of a spate of high-profile false confessions, the Police and Criminal Evidence (PACE) Act of 1984 (Bull and Soukara 2010; Home Office 2003) was enacted.”
• Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions (2012, background): “org • Educing information. Interrogation: Science and Art. Intelligence Science Board, Phase 1 Report (December, 2006). Washington, DC: National Defense Intelligence College. • Bull, R., Valentine, T., and Williamson, T. (Eds.) (2009). Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing.”