Stated preferences for imported and hormone-treated beef: application of a mixed logit model

By Frode Alfnes. 2004

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffa88d8dbdf967e4bbf02f201009b295016a6131

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Preferences for urban green spaces and peri-urban forests: An analysis of stated residential choices (2016, methodology): “The ML model invesigates heterogeneity through the random coefficient approach Alfnes, 2004; Aravena, Martinsson, & Scarpa, 2014; Hoyos, 2010; ouwendal & Meijer, 2001; Train, 1998).”
European preferences for beef steak attributes (2005, methodology): “As noted by Alfnes (2004), this describes a panel data model where the cross-sectional element is individual i and the time-series component is the t choice situations.”
A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability (2007, methodology): “Numerous studies have examined consumers’ preferences and willingness-to-pay for mandatory and voluntary labeling programs associated with credence attributes related to preferences for traceability assurances and origin of beef (Alfnes, 2004; Alfnes and Rickertsen, 2003; Dickinson and Bailey, 2002,”
Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates (2009, background): “A growing amount of research suggests consumers possess heterogeneous preferences, so employing a model that allows for and evaluates preference heterogeneity is appropriate (Alfnes, 2004; Alfnes and Rickertsen, 2003; Lusk, Roosen, and Fox, 2003; Tonsor et al., 2005).”
Consumers' acceptance of innovations in dry-cured ham: Impact of reduced salt content, prolonged aging time and new origin (2011, background): “Additionally, two studies comparing Norwegian consumers’ preferences for country of origin of beef, investigated by experimental auction and stated choice experiment, confirmed the effects of origin information (Alfnes, 2004; Alfnes & Rickertsen, 2003).”
Swedish Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare and Biotech: A Choice Experiment (2006, background): “…used to assess consumer’s choices among food product attributes including food safety (e.g., growth hormones and fed genetic corn in beef) and animal welfare (e.g., Alfnes, 2004; Alfnes & Rickertsen, 2003; Baker & Burnham, 2001; Carlsson, Frykblom, & Lagerkvist, 2005a; Lusk, Roosen, & Fox, 2003).”
Consumer willingness to pay for beef meat in a developing country : The effect of information regarding country of origin, price and animal handling prior to slaughter (2009, background): “nificant attribute when purchasing beef ( Alfnes, 2004; Becker, 1999; Bernues, Olaizola, & Corcoran, 2003b; Bernues et al., 2003a; Henson & Northen, 2000; Oliver et al., 2006), and not only in developed countries.”