Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research
By James R. Brinson. Comput. Educ., 2015
548 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Education, Media Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe4d4994188dd14cddd35c52c211432d0901b57b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Education
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Daniel Galan
- Sebastián Dormido
- Luis de la Torre
- Ruben Heradio
- F. Cabrerizo
- Nadira Saab
- Pengyue Guo
In Media Technology
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Daniel Galan
- Sebastián Dormido
- Luis de la Torre
- Ruben Heradio
- F. Cabrerizo
- Nadira Saab
- Pengyue Guo
Citations in the corpus
- A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures (2020, methodology): “Based on this matrix, we summarized the outcomes that were measured and the instruments that were used to measure these outcomes based on commonly used clustering of learning outcomes and research methods (as used in Brinson, 2015 and Post, Guo, Saab, & Admiraal, 2019).”
- Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis (2016, background): “Nowadays, as a number of empirical studies have shown that VRLs provide similar learning outcomes than traditional hand-on labs [185], the research focus is being sifted towards models that enable evaluating the efficacy of specific VRLs to meet particular educational objectives.”