Behaviour change theory and evidence: a presentation to Government

By Susan Michie, Robert West. 2013

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48086751cb72cbcaaed8ba34544ef49bef6bd993

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Benjamin Gardner
2. I. Ajzen
3. Michael P. Kelly
4. R. Campbell
5. L. Hobbs
6. Rachel Davis
7. Z. Hildon
8. Susan Michie

In General Health Professions

1. Benjamin Gardner
2. I. Ajzen
3. Michael P. Kelly
4. R. Campbell
5. L. Hobbs
6. Rachel Davis
7. Z. Hildon
8. Susan Michie

Citations in the corpus

• Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult? (2016, background): “7,38,39 There have also been important developments in sociology and in particular the conception of social practice.”
• Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review (2014, background): “…of behaviour change interventions at individual, community and population levels (Abraham, Kelly, West, & Michie, 2009; Albarracin et al., 2005; Michie & West, 2013; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2007; Nigg, Allegrante, & Ory, 2002).”
• The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares (2015, background): “More importantly, no attempt was made to ensure that the interventions actually changed the beliefs at which they were directed (see the related discussion by Michie & West, 2013).”
• A review and analysis of the use of ‘habit’ in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour (2014, background): “Impulses can be defined as high-level schematic representations of action which, if insufficiently opposed, trigger execution of action (e.g., Michie & West, 2013).”
• A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015, unknown): “…in a particular way, in a given target group and a given context may not be effective for other behaviours [and] target groups [ … ] ’ , which is in no small part due to differences in relevant determinants or differential matched between determinants and methods (Michie & West, 2013, p. 14).”