Generalizability of writing scores: an application of structural equation modeling

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Variability in ESL Essay Rating Processes: The Role of the Rating Scale and Rater Experience (2010, background): “As Schoonen (2005 ) argued, “The effects of task and rater are most likely dependent on what has to be scored in a text and how it has to be scored” (p.”
Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: effects of grade, sex, and ability (2013, unknown): “Narrative writing performance cannot be assumed to be a reliable indicator of performance on other kinds of writing tasks (e.g., Schoonen, 2005).”
Rater types in writing performance assessments: A classification approach to rater variability (2008, unknown): “188, 58084 Hagen, Germany; email: thomas.eckes@testdaf.de Congdon & McQueen, 2000; Engelhard & Myford, 2003; Eckes, 2005b; Schoonen, 2005).”
Student, teacher and class-level correlates of Flemish late elementary school children’s writing performance (2016, methodology): “By providing a broad range of scores between the target texts, the scoring procedure acknowledged large differences across writers (Schoonen, 2005).”
Score generalizability of academic writing tasks: Does one test method fit it all? (2009, background): “This result is similar in many generalizability studies (Brennan et al., 1995; Lee & Kantor, 2005; Schoonen, 2005).”