Lexical access in spoken word production by bilinguals: evidence from the semantic competitor priming paradigm

By Ming-Wei Lee, John N. Williams. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2001

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc0fbc64eeb1b4d90c32efe6b5d7fbeb4a55f99b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech (2006, background): “…of language-specific selection is that both Hermans et al. and Costa et al. found similar effects of semantic distractors on picture naming regardless of the language of the distractor (see also Lee and Williams, 2001, for evidence on cross-language semantic competition using a different paradigm).”
Finding le mot juste: Differences between bilingual and monolingual children's lexical access in comprehension and production* (2009, background): “Researchers are not in agreement as to whether bilingual adults activate both their languages in production tasks or not (see Lee and Williams, 2001; Costa, 2004; Finkbeiner et al., 2006; Gollan et al., 2008; see also Mahon, Costa, Peterson, Vargas and Caramazza, 2007).”
The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective* (2012, methodology): “Four studies (Lee & Williams, 2001; Salomoura & Williams, 2006, 2007; Williams, 2006) used the self-assessment questionnaire of Bachman and Palmer (1989).”
More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. (2008, background): “…bilingualism argue that lexical representations compete for activation between languages (e.g., Green, 1998; Hermans, et al., 1998; Hermans, 2004; Lee & Williams, 2001), but others argue that there is no direct competition for selection between languages (Costa, Miozzo, & Caramazza, 1999;…”
Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control (2007, background): “More specifically, lexical nodes or lemmas, i.e., syntacticallyspecified lexical concepts in different languages may compete for selection (e.g., Green, 1986, 1993, 1998; Hermans, Bongaerts, de Bot, & Schreuder, 1999; Kroll, Bobb, & Wodniecka, 2006; Lee & Williams, 2001; Poulisse, 1999).”
The impact of bilingualism on the executive control and orienting networks of attention (2010, background): “In fact, various models of bilingual speech production posit that selection of the target word in the desired language involves the inhibition of the competing translation words (Green, 1986, 1998; Meuter and Allport, 1999; Lee and Williams, 2001; Costa, Santesteban and Ivanova, 2006; Kroll, Bobb an”
The dynamics of bilingual lexical access (2006, background): “(e.g. Green, 1998; Hermans et al., 1998; Costa and Caramazza, 1999; Lee and Williams, 2001; Costa and Santesteban, 2004a, b).”
Another Look at Cross-Language Competition in Bilingual Speech Production: Lexical and Phonological Factors. (2003, background): “3 See also Wheeldon and Monsell (1994) and Lee and Williams (2001)”