A conceptual application of cooperative game theory to liner shipping strategic alliances

By Dong-Wook Song, P. Panayides. 2002

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Since its advent, the liner shipping industry has been characterized by fierce competition and cooperation amongst the member carriers. In recent years, almost all the liners have sought extensive cooperation with others, as reflected mainly by the formation of strategic shipping alliances. Despite this, there are still some liners who prefer the ‘go-it-alone’ policy and have achieved relative success. It seems that cooperation is not always necessary for a liner company's success. It follows that a study that aims to find the rationale behind liner cooperation (or non-cooperation) is of great significance. Over many years of development, game theory has proved to be a useful tool in the study of economics. It is analytically applicable in this market. With these arguments in mind, this paper aims to apply cooperative game theory to analyse co-operation among members of liner shipping strategic alliances. This will involve: (i) presenting a detailed and systematic analysis of liner shipping strategic alliances: (ii) a concise overview of the development of game theory with specific focus on cooperative game theory, and (iii) deducing a conceptual framework through the application of cooperative game theory to liner shipping strategic alliances. The accomplishment of the aforementioned objectives will enhance understanding of inter-organizational relationships and decision-making behaviour in the liner shipping sector.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb11c02ad38c108240a93c35bc62644c6efbcda9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Young-Tae Chang
  2. Paul Tae-Woo Lee
  3. Hitoshi Mitsuhashi
  4. Masahiro Ishii
  5. K. Tezuka
  6. Henrich R. Greve
  7. Philip Bromiley
  8. Jared D. Harris

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

  1. Young-Tae Chang
  2. Paul Tae-Woo Lee
  3. Masahiro Ishii
  4. K. Tezuka

In Strategy and Management

  1. Young-Tae Chang
  2. Paul Tae-Woo Lee
  3. Hitoshi Mitsuhashi
  4. Masahiro Ishii
  5. K. Tezuka
  6. Henrich R. Greve
  7. William Ocasio
  8. George A. Shinkle

Citations in the corpus