A low-cost lightweight climbing robot for the inspection of vertical surfaces
By G. Rosa, M. Messina, G. Muscato, R. Sinatra. 2002
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb0a6456171049f459395aa71e53a79124405683
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- Sangbae Kim
- Daniel E. Koditschek
- Robert J. Full
- Mark R. Cutkosky
- William R. Provancher
- Alan T. Asbeck
- Avik De
- Metin Sitti
In Control and Systems Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- SpinybotII: climbing hard walls with compliant microspines (2005, background): “Previously developed climbing robots have generally employed suction cups [5][6][7], magnets [8][9] or sticky adhesives [10] to cling to smooth vertical surfaces such as windows and interior walls.”
- Smooth Vertical Surface Climbing With Directional Adhesion (2008, methodology): “Previous robots capable of climbing exterior building surfaces such as stucco and brick have utilized microspines similar to those found on insects [2], [29] or a controlled vortex that creates negative aerodynamic lift [32].”
- Biologically inspired climbing with a hexapedal robot (2008, background): “…of Mechanical Engineering Stanford University Stanford, California 94305 e-mail: cutkosky@stanford.edu A. A. Rizzi Boston Dynamics, Inc. 78 Fourth Avenue Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 e-mail: arizzi@bostondynamics.com Journal of Field Robotics 25(4–5), 223–242 (2008) C© 2008 Wiley Periodicals,…”