Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them

By Jennifer Dill, Theresa Carr. 2003

799 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fac846b492f365b5f76cc17bc817f4ea33691a78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. Chandra R. Bhat
2. Ralph Buehler
3. S. Handy
4. Jennifer Dill
5. Bert van Wee
6. K. Maat
7. E. Heinen
8. K. Krizek

In Transportation

1. Jennifer Dill
2. Ralph Buehler
3. Chandra R. Bhat
4. Bert van Wee
5. K. Krizek
6. Naveen Eluru
7. K. Maat
8. S. Handy

Citations in the corpus

• Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. (2010, background): “Data for 43 of the 50 largest cities in the US found from 0 to 1.5 linear miles of bike lanes per square mile (Dill and Carr, 2003).”
• Do City Climate Plans Reduce Emissions (2012, background): “This is the subject of a large and growing literature (for example, Dill and Carr 2003; Newsham, Mancini et al. 2009), and I assume that change in the dependent variables is a necessary (but perhaps not sufficient) condition for emission reductions to occur.”
• Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature (2010, background): “However, Witlox and Tindemans (2004), Plaut (2005), Schwanen and Mokhtarian (2005) and Guo et al. (2007) report a negative relationship between cycling and income; while according to Dill and Carr (2003) and Zacharias (2005), income has no significant effect.”
• Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport (2010, background): “Sources: Nelson and Allen (1997), Dill and Carr (2003), Pucher and Buehler (2006), Pucher et al.”
• Two Approaches to Valuing Some of Bicycle Facilities' Presumed Benefits: Propose a session for the 2007 National Planning Conference in the City of Brotherly Love (2006, background): “The metropolitan area has high rates of cycling use (Barnes & Krizek, 2005; Dill & Carr, 2003), suggesting a relatively high proportion of residents are sensitive to aspects of cycling-related infrastructure.”
• Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. (2011, neutral): “31% increase in bicycle commuters (Dill and Carr, 2003).”
• Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling (2016, methodology): “Many aggregate analyses define cycling levels as the percentage of trips or number of trips by bicycle (e.g. Caulfield et al., 2012; Dill & Carr, 2003; Schoner & Levinson, 2014).”
• Bicycling Choice and Gender Case Study: The Ohio State University (2013, background): “The presence of bicycle facilities in a location is a significant factor in attracting cyclists (Dill and Carr 2003; Nelson and Allen 1997).”
• Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data (2007, methodology): “…in the models have been specified in various ways, including detailed surveys to determine, for example, the required stop frequency on a journey (Rietveld and Daniel, 2004), miles of bicycle paths per person (Nelson and Allen, 1997) and state spending per capita on cycling (Dill and Carr, 2003).”