Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research
By Angelo S. Denisi, Caitlin E. Smith. 2014
283 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa6835c2fb3572660d8c6d67ace97caa7ac6f480
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Kevin J. Murphy
- Robert E. Ployhart
- M. Campion
- R. Peccei
- E. Pulakos
- Adelien Decramer
- Thomas Van Waeyenberg
- T. Judge
In Strategy and Management
- Kevin J. Murphy
- Robert E. Ployhart
- R. Peccei
- Adelien Decramer
- Thomas Van Waeyenberg
- Ana Albuquerque
- Katherine A. Gunny
- L. Bebchuk
Citations in the corpus
- Resources for What? Understanding Performance in the Resource-Based View and Strategic Human Capital Resource Literatures (2021, background): “The emergence of collective performance behavior and outcomes from individual-level origins remains one of the grand challenge questions facing management (DeNisi & Smith, 2014; Goodman & Rousseau, 2004; James, 1973).”
- Performance management and teacher performance: the role of affective organizational commitment and exhaustion (2020, methodology): “This connects with prior research on HRM system strength (e.g. Hauff et al., 2017) and theoretical frameworks of performance management specifically (e.g. DeNisi & Smith, 2014).”
- Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward (2019, unknown): “11 Given the uncertain quality of performance evaluations by humans, can we use them for training AI algorithms?”
- Getting Rid of Performance Ratings: Genius or Folly? A Debate (2016, background): “…management reform (e.g., Pulakos, Mueller-Hanson, Arad, & Moye, 2015; Pulakos & O’Leary, 2011), which is that over 25 years of research have shown that formal system changes have no discernable impact on driving more effective performance management behavior or performance (DeNisi & Smith, 2014).”