Relational and Physical Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Peer Relations
By M. Zimmer‐Gembeck, Tasha C. Geiger, Nicki R. Crick. 2005
351 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa13e47958568d956c1aebd205c878ad5e85860d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Jamie M. Ostrov
- Rhiarne E. Pronk
- Nicki R. Crick
- M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
- Constantinos M. Kokkinos
- Ioanna Voulgaridou
- Claire Monks
- S. O’Toole
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Sara E. Goldstein
- C. Boyd
- Amy M. Young
- Rhiarne E. Pronk
- Jamie M. Ostrov
- M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
- S. O’Toole
- Crystal Cullerton-Sen
In Social Psychology
- Jamie M. Ostrov
- R. Houston
- Rhiarne E. Pronk
- M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
- Nicki R. Crick
- Constantinos M. Kokkinos
- Ioanna Voulgaridou
- Claire Monks
Citations in the corpus
- It’s “Mean,” But What Does It Mean to Adolescents? Relational Aggression Described by Victims, Aggressors, and Their Peers (2010, background): “…relationally aggressive than boys, especially beginning at about the age of 12 or 13 years (Geiger, Zimmer-Gembeck, & Crick, 2004; Rys & Bear, 1997; Zimmer-Gembeck et al., 2005), researchers have increasingly described boys’ relational aggression by noting that their behaviors may have a different…”
- Profiles and Correlates of Relational Aggression in Young Adults’ Romantic Relationships (2008, result): “Prior work with regard to this issue has been mixed, with some studies work showing similar patterns of prediction for relational aggression in platonic peer relationships across males and females (e.g., Goldstein and Tisak 2004; Werner and Nixon 2005), and other projects showing evidence of gender ”
- Relational aggression in adolescents: A review of theoretical and empirical research (2015, background): “preschool to the adolescent years (e.g., Crick & Grotpeter, 1995; Crick et al., 2006b; Zimmer-Gembeck et al., 2005).”
- The Utility of Forms and Functions of Aggression in Emerging Adulthood: Association with Personality Disorder Symptomatology (2008, background): “To test the potential for gender moderation (e.g., Zimmer-Gembeck et al. 2005 ), at step 2, the interactions between each aggression subtype and gender were simultaneously added.”
- The Intervening Role of Relational Aggression between Psychological Control and Friendship Quality (2008, neutral): “It seems likely that such negative friendship outcomes may in turn increase the likelihood of relational aggression, and indeed recent research has empirically documented such bidirectional effects in middle childhood (Werner & Crick, 2004; Zimmer-Gembeck et al., 2005 ).2 Over time, ado-”
- What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. (2014, background): “…as recruiting classmates to exclude a target peer appears to be facilitated by social status, as children with a high level of popularity have been found to commit more bullying or relationally aggressive acts in the future (Rodkin & Berger, 2008; Rose et al., 2004; Zimmer-Gembeck et al., 2005).”
- Relational Aggression at School: Associations with School Safety and Social Climate (2008, methodology): “These inconsistencies may be due in part to the developmental period in which youth are assessed, the method of assessment (with more inconsistencies found in self-report measures), and perhaps due to cultural differences (e.g., Archer and Coyne 2005; Crick and Zahn-Waxler 2003; Little et al. 2003; ”
- A Longitudinal Study of Relational and Physical Aggression in Preschool. (2006, background): “... holdfornon-U.S.aswellasU.S.samplesincludingItalian,Russian,Chinese,andGermansamples(e.g.,Hartetal.,1998; TomadaSforareviewseeCricketal.,1999).Althoughlongitudinalstudiesarefewinnumber,available evidence indicates that relational aggression predicts future as well as concurrent social–psychologic”
- Executive function and theory of mind as predictors of aggressive and prosocial behavior and peer acceptance in early childhood (2017, background): “Girls (8–15 years) are also rated as more prosocial and accepted by their peers (Smith, Rose, & Schwartz-Mette, 2009; Zimmer-Gembeck, 2005).”