The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment

By Joan M. McMahon, R. Harvey. 2007

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8db75f8d9e723f35d4ae4b7da19763e198dc1df

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Geoffrey M. Kistruck
2. Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
3. A. Musbah
4. Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour
5. David A. Tyfa
6. Brian G. Whitaker
7. Hengky Latan
8. B. Smith

In Information Systems and Management

1. Hengky Latan
2. Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
3. Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour
4. Geoffrey M. Kistruck
5. A. Musbah
6. David A. Tyfa
7. Brian G. Whitaker
8. B. Smith

In Social Psychology

1. Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
2. A. Musbah
3. David A. Tyfa
4. Brian G. Whitaker
5. Hengky Latan
6. Lindsey Godwin
7. Christian M. Ringle
8. C. Cowton

Citations in the corpus

• The Antecedents of Moral Imagination in the Workplace: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective (2013, background): “Recent research indicates that the predominant element comprising moral intensity is the expected harm (expressed as a high likelihood of immediate, substantial, and long-ranging harm) that may befall the target character in the vignette (Kish-Gephart et al. 2010; McMahon and Harvey 2007).”
• The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making (2016, background): “Most of these studies (e.g. Karacaer et al. 2009; May and Pauli 2002; McMahon and Harvey 2007; Singhapakdi et al. 1996; Sweeney and Costello 2009) reveal a positive significant relationship with the ethical decision-making process.”
• Whistleblowing Intentions Among Public Accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the Moderation Effects (2016, background): “Previous research has found a significant relationship between moral intensity and the intention to behave ethically (Singer 1996; Coram et al. 2008; McMahon and Harvey 2007; Valentine and Hollingworth 2012) and the intention of whistleblowing (Clements and Shawver 2011; Curtis and Taylor 2009;…”
• Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis (2017, background): “Previous research has found a significant relationship between moral intensity and ethical judgments (Singer et al. 1998; Valentine and Hollingworth 2012; Yu 2015; McMahon and Harvey 2007; Leitsch 2004).”
• The Impact of Moral Intensity and Desire for Control on Scaling Decisions in Social Entrepreneurship (2016, background): “In this way, the concentration of effect relates the amount of harm (or benefit) relative to the number of people affected (McMahon and Harvey 2007).”