Kolb's experiential learning model: critique from a modelling perspective

By Harald Bergsteiner, Gayle C. Avery, R. Neumann. 2010

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8859fab74a8e410017933236806dd5bab27e293

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Thomas Howard Morris
2. Jeb Schenck
3. J. Cruickshank

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Thomas Howard Morris

Citations in the corpus

• Evolving Kolb (2015, result): “Bergsteiner et al. (2010) also found that KELT’s two-dimensional nature contributed to major contradictions and inconsistencies, thus impeding reliable research using KELT.”
• Experiential learning – a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model (2019, methodology): “(1984, p. 30) More than thirty years onwards, Kolb (2015) defended his theoretical position against a multitude of critiques (e.g., Bergsteiner et al., 2010, 2014; Jarvis, 2012; Miettinen, 2000; Schenck & Cruickshank, 2015) that the experiential learning process consists of, a four-stage cycle…”