Situation Invisibility and Attribution in Distributed Collaborations
By Catherine Durnell Cramton, Kara L. Orvis, Jean Wilson. 2007
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7a366d85e0ad730ee04e35f7b9c7a9ec51a4cf7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Noam Lapidot-Lefler
- Nicole B. Ellison
- Michael Boyer O'Leary
- Jean Wilson
- Matthew S. Weber
- Quintus Jett
- Jennifer L. Gibbs
- Azy Barak
In Sociology and Political Science
- Noam Lapidot-Lefler
- Jennifer L. Gibbs
- Nicole B. Ellison
- Matthew S. Weber
- Azy Barak
- Michael Boyer O'Leary
- Cliff Lampe
- Charles W. Steinfield
Citations in the corpus
- Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility (2014, unknown): “Research has shown that when people cannot see what others do, or when, with whom, and how they do it, there is less interpersonal trust among coworkers (Cramton et al. 2007).”
- Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition (2012, background): “…through collocation vs. distribution (through online communication) of working teams to examine the impact on interpersonal relationships, Cramton, Orvis, and Wilson (2007) found that situational invisibility produced dispositional attributions rather than situational attributions, thus…”
- The Use of Enterprise Social Network Sites for Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Organizations (2015, background): “…lunch can provide signals about the availability of such members, helping with expectations about response time and minimizing the potential for negative attri-butions that often arise due to the “situational invisibility” that can exist among dispersed coworkers (Cramton, Orvis, & Wilson, 2007).”
- Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close (2008, background): “When people identify with one another, they are not only more predictable but they are also more likely receive the benefit of the doubt than the brunt of faulty attribution (Cramton et al. 2007).”