Does intellectual capital matter? High-performance work systems and bilateral innovative capabilities

By Duanxu Wang, Shuai Chen. 2013

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f68184d3423f1713172f002b36b3b5e83a7b7bdd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Aino Kianto
2. Nekane Aramburu
3. Nick Bontis
4. Josune Sáenz
5. Henri Inkinen
6. Ruzita Jusoh
7. Kaveh Asiaei

In Strategy and Management

1. Henri Inkinen
2. Ruzita Jusoh
3. Kaveh Asiaei
4. Aino Kianto
5. Nekane Aramburu
6. Josune Sáenz
7. Nick Bontis
8. P. Vergauwen

Citations in the corpus

• Intellectual capital and performance measurement systems in Iran (2018, background): “Given the foregoing argument, the current study follows the latter perspective in which social capital is defined as the informal and personal intrafirm networks that are not predetermined by an organization (Fukuyama, 1997; Pennings et al., 1998; Gupta and Govindarajan, 2000; Burt, 1997; Chow and C”
• Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation (2017, methodology): “In their hypothesis formulation, Wang and Chen (2013) do not consider the role of human capital as an antecedent of organizational or structural capital and social or relational capital; instead, they treat all IC components as being at the same level.”
• Intellectual capital, knowledge management practices and firm performance (2017, background): “, 2012) and that IC is associated with the firm’s innovation performance (Carmona-Lavado et al., 2010; Cabello-Medina et al., 2011; Leitner, 2011; Wang and Chen, 2013; Subramaniam and Youndt, 2005).”