When the cat’s away, some mice will play: A basic trait account of dishonest behavior
By Benjamin E. Hilbig, Ingo Zettler. 2015
151 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f64d4cd1b0abff7be9e3a5532759f13deb6fa84a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
- Isabel Thielmann
- Kibeom Lee
- M. Ashton
- Morten Moshagen
- Daniel W. Heck
- Ingo Zettler
- Reinout E. de Vries
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Isabel Thielmann
- M. Ashton
- Kibeom Lee
- Morten Moshagen
- Daniel W. Heck
- Collin Raymond
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
- Daniele Nosenzo
In Sociology and Political Science
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
- Kibeom Lee
- Isabel Thielmann
- M. Ashton
- Morten Moshagen
- Daniel W. Heck
- Collin Raymond
- Daniele Nosenzo
Citations in the corpus
- Objections to the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure—and why those Objections Fail (2020, background): “This theoretical distinction is borne out empirically in economic games research: Honesty-Humility predicts giving in the dictator game, whereas (HEXACO) Agreeableness predicts acceptance of unfair offers in the ultimatum game; Big Five Agreeableness is a weaker predictor of each (e.g. Hilbig et al.”
- Preferences for Truth‐Telling (2016, background): “1D2 Hilbig and Zettler 2015 * 4 342 Germany multiple asy.”
- Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, background): “Specifically, research found that low levels of Honesty-Humility predicted cheating (Hershfield, Cohen, & Thompson, 2012; Hilbig & Zettler, 2015), immoral behavior (Hilbig, Moshagen, & Zettler, 2015), and unethical business practices (Ashton & Lee, 2008b; Cohen et al., 2014; Lee, Ashton, Morrison,…”
- Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making (2018, methodology): “Moreover, five of the studies measured the Big Five using the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI; Costa &McCrae, 1992).3 The total sample size across these studies amounted to N = 5,002 responses from 4,855 partic- samples were collected by different research groups at different universities and tha”