Personality Development in the Context of the Neo-Socioanalytic Model of Personality.

By B. Roberts, D. Wood. 2006

479 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f623beefd48502e5e11163db87e9d09e90ac9531

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

In Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

Personality development: stability and change. (2005, background): “Principles of Personality Development in Adulthood The empirical results of longitudinal studies allow us to infer a number of principles about personality development, from adolescence through adult life (Roberts & Wood 2004).”
Social and emotional skills for student success and well-being: Conceptual framework for the OECD study on social and emotional skills (2018, background): “…exact causality for these relationships is challenging however, because high well-being has also been found to promote positive personality change (Roberts and Wood, 2006[119]; Specht, Egloff and Schmukle, 2013[120]; Soto, 2014[121]) and other variables may simultaneously promote positive…”
Personality, Motivation, and College Readiness: A Prospectus for Assessment and Development (2014, background): “Similarly, B. W. Roberts and Wood (2006) proposed a neo-socioanalytic model of personality, which attempts to marry trait and social-cognitive perspectives on personality to accommodate this distinction.1 In B. W. Roberts and Wood’s (2006) scheme, traits are separate from goals and motives.”
Personality Trait Change in Adulthood (2008, background): “Specifically, it has been proposed that the quasi-universal trend to invest in the social roles tied to one’s career, family, and community in young adulthood—a process described as social investment—serves as a catalyst for personality-trait change (Roberts & Wood, 2006).”
What Drives Adult Personality Development? A Comparison of Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence (2014, background): “…to its genetically determined set point, the neo-socioanalytic theory proposes that change in personality should endure for as long as an individual holds the same social role and as long as the associated role expectations remain similar (cf. role continuity principle, Roberts & Wood, 2006).”
Whole Trait Theory (2014, background): “For example, Costa and McCrae (2006) have motives and cognitions as an outcome of traits, McAdams and Olson (2010) and Roberts and Wood (2006) hold motivational and trait domains as separate domains of personality functioning, and Winter and colleagues (1998) suggested motives provide the direction…”
Personality across working life: The longitudinal and reciprocal influences of personality on work (2013, background): “Typically, individuals do experience dramatic transformation, but rather gradually develop over long periods of time (e.g., 10 years; Roberts & Wood, 2006).”
Contextualized Personality, beyond Traits (2015, background): “Indeed, alongside shifts in social roles themselves (Roberts & Wood, 2006), changes in goals and narratives may help explain the normative development of traits across the lifespan.”
Post–traumatic Growth as Positive Personality Change: Evidence, Controversies and Future Directions (2014, background): “As noted earlier, personality change in adulthood may occur because (most) people invest in specific social roles tied to their families, work and communities, which in turn serve as catalysts for increasing psychological maturity (Roberts & Wood, 2006).”
What Accounts for Personality Maturation in Early Adulthood? (2015, background): “To the extent that these demands can be formulated in trait terms (e.g., to act in a conscientiousness way), transitional-role experiences are supposed to form a reward structure for personality maturation (Roberts & Wood, 2006).”
Personality Traits and Relationship Satisfaction in Intimate Couples: Three Perspectives on Personality (2014, background): “It provides a unique view on personality traits from an inside perspective reflecting one’s identity (Hogan & Roberts, 2004; Roberts & Wood, 2006).”
Back to the Future: Personality and Assessment and Personality Development. (2009, methodology): “We have catalogued an initial list of social cognitive processes that should be linked to continuity (Roberts & Wood, 2006; Roberts, Wood, & Caspi, 2008).”
Personality Change: Implications for Organizational Behavior (2018, background): “The appearance of relatively unchanging personality may depend on the consistency of situations to which the individual is exposed (Mischel, 1973; Roberts & Wood, 2006).”
Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012, background): “Of the psychosocial contextual constructs, stress (in general), stress relating to academia, and goal commitment obtained r s .10; however, no study contained all three constructs, so no model was tested.”
Personality Trait Development During the Transition to Parenthood (2016, background): “Alternatively, social investment theory ([SIT]; Roberts & Wood, 2006) proposes that personality maturation is associated with agegraded life transitions, such as entering the labor force, marrying, and becoming a parent because these transitions stimulate individuals to invest in new social roles.”