Eye Movements as Reflections of Comprehension Processes in Reading

548 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Using Reading Times and Eye-Movements to Measure Cognitive Engagement (2015, background): “Finally, the article describes two examples of how self-paced reading and eye-tracking can be used to measure engagement.”
The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search (2009, methodology): “Interestingly, if the word to the right of fixation also disappears or is masked, then reading is disrupted (Rayner et al., 2006c); this quite strongly demonstrates that the word to the right of fixation is very important in reading.”
The spatial coding model of visual word identification. (2010, background): “…that affect the exterior letters have a more disruptive effect on word identification than do transpositions of interior letters (e.g., Bruner & O'Dowd, 1958; Chambers, 1979; Holmes & Ng, 1993; Perea & Lupker, 2003a; Schoonbaert & Grainger, 2004; Rayner et al., 2006; White et al., 2008).”
Higher-Order Comprehension Processes in Struggling Readers: A Perspective for Research and Intervention (2007, unknown): “Think-aloud and eye-tracking methodologies (Ericsson & Simon, 1984; Rayner, 1986; Rayner, Chace, Slattery, & Ashby, 2006) have the potential to provide insight into the moment-by-moment processes readers engage in as they read and respond to interventions applied during reading.”