Delusions of gender : how our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference
By C. Fine. 2010
483 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4429db6e582f1fb06d006bb2abd71a2139de8ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Wendy Wood
- A. Eagly
- Jennifer Saul
- W. Bouman
- S. Shields
- C. Richards
- M. Barker
- L. Seal
Citations in the corpus
- Feminism and the Evolution of Sex Differences and Similarities (2011, methodology): “In view of these recent battles and many earlier skirmishes (see Fausto-Sterling 1985, 2000; Shields 1975; Shields and Bhatia 2009), perhaps the editors of Sex Roles intended that this Special Issue would primarily provide critics of evolutionary psychology an attractive outlet for their research.”
- Gender differences in customer expectations and perceptions of corporate social responsibility (2016, background): “…research (Ziliak & McCloskey, 2008) and, consequently, to biased management and policy decisions, as has been shown in psychology (Hyde, 2005; Fine, 2010), economics (Filippin & Crosetto, 2014; Nelson, 2014) and many other different fields, from political sciences to medicine and…”
- Meta-Analysis on the Roles of Fathers in Parenting: Are They Unique? (2016, background): “Statistically significant effect sizes emerged for the unique contribution of 676 W. H. JEYNES fatherhood for psychological and social measures combined, with a statistically significant effect of .17 (p .05) standard deviation units.”
- Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy (2013, background): “By focusing on the phenomena that I discuss in this chapter, I don’t mean to suggest that bias as traditionally understood (e.g., the conscious belief that 1 Though for some evidence against such generalisations, see Fine 2010 and Jordan-Young 2010.”
- Gender and Emotion (2013, methodology): “Even when psychologists highly skilled at writing for the general audience (e.g., Fine, 2010; Tavris, 1992) put the word out, however, it barely moves the needle on the essentialize-o-meter.”
- Non-binary or genderqueer genders (2016, background): “It is worth considering that there are no psychological fields in which male and female are discrete (Fine, 2010) and that the overlap is always greater than any difference (Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974).”
- Genderqueer and non-binary genders (2017, background): “For example, if women are encouraged to consider gender stereotypes around maths, or even just to tick a gender box prior to being tested, they tend to perform worse on maths problems and demonstrate lower self-worth in this area (see Fine, 2010 for an overview of such research).”
- Single-Sex Education and the Brain (2013, background): “Nonetheless, many highly-publicized claims about brain gender differences have failed to hold up to replication (Fine 2010; JordanYoung 2010), and research has yet to identify a definitive neural basis for any of the well-described psychological differences between men and women (McCarthy and Arnold”
- Bilingualism and cognition (2014, background): “That is particularly apparent in research on brain differences among males and females, where brain differences are often not paired with behavioral differences (e.g., DeVries, 2004; Eliot, 2011; Fine, 2010), but the phenomenon has broad scope.”