Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists

By M. Fox. 2005

463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f2eba080a60030ae7a4b38c2d3814faf83c70ca0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing (2009, background): “Previous Research 5 More recent empirical evidence suggests that, even though women's productivity is still below that of men, children and motherhood are not apparently able to account for this difference (Fox 2005; Stack 2004).”
Parenting and research productivity: New evidence and methods (2010, background): “Consequently, papers published in high-impact journals, such as the American Sociological Review and Language, counted more in our measure of visibility than papers published in journals with lower scores.5 Members of academic fields perhaps rely more on citation counts than journal reputations to…”
Women in Academic Science (2014, background): “It is also similar to the 22% (for five STEM fields serving as proxies for all of the natural sciences) identified by Fox (2005) for the 1990-through-1994 period.”
Comparing Research Productivity Across Disciplines and Career Stages (2013, background): “With varying rates of participation of women in different disciplines and their childbearing and childrearing responsibilities (Fox 2005; Sonnert et al. 2007), this study expects:”
Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: new insights for academic based research (2013, unknown): “It also serves to control for the effects of academic seniority, taking into account time lags between research work, submission and publication which are influenced by variables associated with current working behaviors and activities that can be measured through a survey exercise (Fox 2005).”
Onto, Up, Off the Academic Faculty Ladder: The Gendered Effects of Family on Career Transitions for a Cohort of Social Science Ph.D.s (2011, background): “Female Ph.D. recipients are much more likely to have partners with professional or other graduate degrees; faculty women are more likely to be married to another academic (Astin & Milem, 1997; Finkelstein, 1984; Fox, 2005; Jacobs, 2004).”
No Woman is Like a Man (in Academia): The Masculine Symbolic Order and the Unwanted Female Body (2013, background): “Complex considerations affecting women’s position in academia extend beyond marital status and the presence or absence of children (Fox, 2005; Probert, 2005) or the existence of institutional policies aiming to promote gender diversity (Gatrell, 2011).”
Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants (2011, background): “Many studies have examined university faculty family dynamics, but most often in connection with research productivity (Bellas & Toutkoushian, 1999; Fox, 2005; Sax, Hagedorn, Arredondo, & Dicrisi, 2002; Xie & Shauman, 1998).”
Gender Differences in Time Spent on Parenting and Domestic Responsibilities by High-Achieving Young Physician-Researchers (2014, result): “Similar patterns have been documented in other highly educated samples (29, 30), suggesting that conventional norms about marriage may continue to limit the pool from which educated women choose life partners more than they affect educated men.”