A theory of interest

By J. Hülsmann. 2002

1,511 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f291fc2379463ba27cd772ceb8b545878205034c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

What financial and non‐financial information on intangibles is value‐relevant? A review of the evidence (2008, positive): “Fisher and Heinkel (2007) study management's motivation for truth-telling and reputation.”
The Decline of Inflation and the Bull Market of 1982–1999 (2002, result): “This puzzling phenomenon is in direct contradiction to the Fisher (1930) hypothesis, which states that stocks, being real assets, should have nominal returns that are positively related to expected inflation.”
Economic variables and stock market returns: evidence from the Athens stock exchange (2006, background): “Similarly, the relationship between inflation and stock returns has been a matter of considerable interest since Fisher (1930) suggested that common stocks are considered a good hedge against inflation since they represent a claim on real assets whose value is assumed to be independent of the…”
Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect (2006, background): “Fisher (1930) emphasized that the adjustment towards the hypothesized relationship between the nominal interest and inflation rates could potentially take very long time.”
Common-Ownership Concentration and Corporate Conduct (2018, background): “The assumption of own-firm profit (or, more accurately, value) maximization has appeared in formal economic thinking at least since Fisher (1930).”
Behavioral Public Economics: Welfare and Policy Analysis with Non-Standard Decision-Makers (2005, neutral): “This framework traces its roots to Irving Fisher (1930), and lies at the heart of the Life Cycle Hypothesis articulated by Modigliani and Brumberg (1954).”
On Intertemporal Selfishness: How the Perceived Instability of Identity Underlies Impatient Consumption (2011, background): “DOI: 10.1086/658339 On Intertemporal Selfishness: How the Perceived Instability of Identity Underlies”
The innovative enterprise and corporate governance (2000, background): “(Fisher, 1930, p. 52) For Fisher, that the act of waiting brought forth a return to capital was inherent in the technique or the "objective facts" of production.”
Entrepreneurial Motivations: What Do We Still Need to Know? (2011, background): “In addition, there are essentially two schools of motivational theories: one based in economics and the other rooted in psychology (Fisher 1930) that have been in conflict with each other for decades.”
Filling the gap between planning and doing: Psychological factors involved in the successful implementation of saving intention (2007, background): “Böhm-Bawerk (1890) and Fisher (1930) linked successful saving to individual differences in degree of impatience (or thrift) that influenced subjective utility of future goods.”
Forecasting technological change in agriculture—An endogenous implementation in a global land use model (2014, methodology): “To be able to reproduce planning foresight in MAgPIE we use the annuity approach to transfer l ump-sum TC investment to periodic payments including interest [61].”
Parents’ influence on children’s future orientation and saving (2006, positive): “The notion of differences in rates of time preference as an explanation for interand intra-generational economic inequality was put forward by Fisher (1930).”
Understanding Earnings Quality: A Review of the Proxies, Their Determinants and Their Consequences (2010, methodology): “66 See Barth et al. (2008) for a thorough discussion of the debate.”
Integrating Theories of Motivation (2006, background): “, Franken, 1994; Kanfer, 1990; Kleinbeck, Quast, Thierry, & Häcker, 1990; Mitchell, 1997). On the other hand, economists have maintained, since at least Stigler and Becker (1977), that tastes or preferences—that is, needs or traits—provide little or no prediction or explanation of human behavior.”