The innovative enterprise and corporate governance

By Mary O’Sullivan. 2000

322 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7066da5e8c04456d52e8aa4294045a88fe8edecf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The Us Stock Market and the Governance of Innovative Enterprise (2007, background): “Top managers of US industrial corporations became ardent advocates of this perspective; quite apart from their ideological predispositions, the reality of their stock-based compensation inured them to “maximizing shareholder value” (Lazonick and O’Sullivan 2000a).”
Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota: comparative case studies of organizational capability enhancement (2004, background): “A system of corporate governance shapes who makes investment decisions in corporations, what types of investments they make, and how returns from investments are distributed (O’Sullivan 2000).”
Corporate Governance and Innovation: A Survey (2012, unknown): “O’Sullivan (2000) suggests that shareholders of successful enterprises may not wait until the innovation generates commercial revenues and may ‘go public’ to take advantage of the stock market’s evaluation of the innovation.”
Global Strategic Partnerships between MNEs and NGOs: Drivers of Change and Ethical Issues (2004, background): “We believe that international business research needs to differentiate between shareholder and stakeholder business systems (Albert, 1991; Freeman, 1984; Andreff, 2002; O’Sullivan, 2000; Chui, 2002).”
The demand and supply of external finance for innovative firms (2013, unknown): “This article addresses the connection between innovation and firm financing, a problem on which Schumpeter (1942) commented more extensively than is usually reflected in contemporary Neo-Schumpeterian research (O’Sullivan, 2000).”
Dynamic capabilities and sustained innovation: strategic control and financial commitment at Rolls-Royce plc (2005, background): “Given the uncertain, cumulative and collective characteristics of the innovation process, innovative enterprise depends on three social conditions: strategic control, financial commitment and organizational integration (Lazonick and O’Sullivan, 2000; see also O’Sullivan, 2000, 2004; Lazonick, 2004b”
The risk-reward nexus in the innovation-inequality relationship: who takes the risks? Who gets the rewards? (2013, background): “For the sake of maximizing the residual, according to this highly influential view of the economic world, corporations should be run to “maximize shareholder value” because, in a market economy, it is only shareholders who take risk (for critiques, see Lazonick and O’Sullivan, 2000; O’Sullivan, 2000”
Ownership structures and R&D in Europe: the good institutional investors, the bad and ugly impatient shareholders (2013, background): “However, the argument according to which the main purpose of companies should be to maximize shareholder value has been questioned by studies trying to propose a theory of innovative enterprise (Lazonik & Sullivan, 2000; O’Sullivan, 2000; Carpenter, Lazonick, O’Sullivan, 2003; Lazonick, 2009).”
Maximizing shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance (2000, background): “5 For an elaboration of shareholder theory and a critique, see O’Sullivan (1999).”