Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties that Split Pies
By M. Blyler, Russell W. Coff. 2003
636 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f24ef63b33a99e219f140dd2563c0f64f4ebf206
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Cliff Bowman
- Véronique Ambrosini
- David J. Teece
- Jim Andersén
- Gernot Grabher
- Frank T. Rothaermel
- Konstantinos Grigoriou
- Frank J. van Rijnsoever
In Safety Research
- Cliff Bowman
- Véronique Ambrosini
- Jim Andersén
- David J. Teece
- Gernot Grabher
- Frank T. Rothaermel
- Konstantinos Grigoriou
- Tomasz Obloj
In Sociology and Political Science
- Cliff Bowman
- Véronique Ambrosini
- Per Davidsson
- David J. Teece
- Jim Andersén
- Gernot Grabher
- Frank T. Rothaermel
- Konstantinos Grigoriou
Citations in the corpus
- *Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda (2006, background): “Table I shows that several authors have discussed specific qualities of dynamic capabilities (Zollo and Winter, 2002), the internal and external antecedents of their formation processes (Blyler and Coff, 2003; Korr and Mahoney, 2005; Verona and Ravasi, 2003; Wheeler 2002; Zollo and Winter, 2002) and”
- The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities (2005, background): “Accordingly, social capital may be the key not only for creating ambidexterous organizations (Tushman & O’Reilly, 1997), but also for developing “dynamic capabilities” that enable organizations to shift their competitive focus and achieve new forms of competitive advantage ( Blyler & Coff, 2003; Te”
- Structural Microfoundations of Innovation (2014, result): “…have argued that individuals with high levels of social capital may be able to appropriate at least some of the added value because of the social capital adding credibility to their claims (Blyler & Coff, 2003), a view that can be consistent with our arguments depending on the comparison group.”
- Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks? (2004, background): “Second, sociality provides critical information about job opportunities for the nomadic project worker as well as on pending accounts and thus on potentially upcoming projects (see also DeFillippi and Arthur, 1998; Ekinsmyth, 2002; Blyler and Coff, 2003).”
- Strategic Human Capital (2014, background): “In addition, in the context of causal ambiguity, managers may claim responsibility for the performance and argue that they are entitled to be compensated for generating the gains (Blyler & Coff, 2003).”
- The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach (2016, neutral): “…theoretical framework that develops the concept of 'concurrent learning'; insights about managing growth and the utility of distributed practice Blyler & Coff (2003) Conceptual Literature review; proposition development Identification of the specific role of social capital in a dynamic…”
- Strategic resources and firm performance (2011, background): “Due to the importance of human resources, rents are often appropriated, by different stakeholders, with strong bargaining power, or great social capital (Blyler and Coff, 2003).”