Development and initial assessment of a short measure for adult playfulness: The SMAP

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A new structural model for the study of adult playfulness: Assessment and exploration of an understudied individual differences variable (2017, methodology): “Convergent validity was supported by good convergence with three other playfulness questionnaires (Barnett, 2007; Glynn & Webster, 1992; Proyer, 2012b).”
Play at Work: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research (2018, methodology): “First, most of the studies reviewed here make use of different scales to measure play, such as the Adult Playfulness Scale (Glynn & Webster, 1992), the Short Measure for Adult Playfulness (Proyer, 2012a), the Older Adult Playfulness Scale (Yarnal & Qian, 2011), and the Playfulness Scale for Adults (”
Examining playfulness in adults: Testing its correlates with personality, positive psychological functioning, goal aspirations, and multi-methodically assessed ingenuity (2012, unknown): “Additionally, the Short Measure of Adult Playfulness (SMAP; Proyer, 2012) has been used for the assessment of the global, cognitive aspect of playfulness.”
The well-being of playful adults: Adult playfulness, subjective well-being, physical well-being, and the pursuit of enjoyable activities (2013, methodology): “This seems to be further substantiated by Proyer (2012c), who found that playfulness relates to the satisfaction of intrinsic life goals with health being one of them.”