Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology

By J. Marshall. 2004

2,580 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f19afa86f1df4c904edc3075b3dfa3eb2f0dea47

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Technology Parks versus Science Parks: does the university make the difference? (2013, background): “The importance of universities as external sources of knowledge for firm innovation has been widely recognized since the 1980s (Bozeman, 2000) and is emphasized in Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff’s (1997) triple helix notion and by open-innovation (Chesbrough, 2003) approaches.”
Twenty challenges to innovation studies (2015, unknown): “' (Chesbrough, 2003, pp.xx & xxiv).”
Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective (2015, background): “No longer are innovations (and even the ideas from which they emerge) developed from within the confines of an organization; instead, they evolve from the joint action of a network of actors ranging from suppliers and partners to customers and independent inventors—that is, a network-centric focus (”
Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests (2011, background): “Many firms currently sponsor a variety of co-creation activities to involve consumers and unidentified individuals on the Internet in the process of product development and value creation [14, 15, 35, 37, 70, 78].”
Federated Learning for Open Banking (2021, background): “As a subspecies to the open innovation [7,8] concept, open banking is an emerging trend in turning banks into ﬁnancial service platforms, namely banking as a service.”
Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes (2004, background): “Chesbrough (2002; 2003) describes four erosion factors that compel companies to transform their innovation strategy into a more flexible open innovation approach.”
Infrastructure: the social value of shared resources (2012, unknown): “…between monopoly power and the diffusion of innovation; Scotchmer, 2006), other areas, such as research on GPTs, are just touched upon (Bresnahan and Trajtenberg, 1995) or, like open innovation (Chesbrough, 2006) and the concept of an appropriability regime (Teece, 1986), are not discussed at all.”
Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises (2011, background): “knowledge, have become more important (Chesbrough, 2003; Laursen and Salter, 2006).”
The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation (2014, background): “The emerging paradigm of open innovation is anchored in the idea that a significant amount of innovation is derived outside a firm’s internal research development endeavors and greater, often novel learning is leveraged from outside sources [67].”
Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon (2009, background): “We need to work with smart people inside and outside our company’ (Chesbrough, 2003).”
External Partnerships in Employee Education and Development as the Key to Facing Industry 4.0 Challenges (2019, background): “Only the opening of enterprise boundaries in an enterprise’s innovation process will allow “the use of intentional inflows and outflows of knowledge to accelerate internal innovations, as well as their expansion into markets for the external use of innovation” [23].”
Limits to Modularity: Reflections on Recent Developments in Chip Design (2005, background): “(Chesbrough, 2003b: 184–185).”
Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options (2008, background): “First, it has been one of the major organizational vehicles to apply open innovation in innovating firms (Chesbrough, 2000, 2003).”
The Future of Open Innovation (2010, background): “The principle of open innovation has, for example, penetrated pioneering industries such as software, electronics, telecom, pharma and biotech, while the software and electronics industries are progressively building on the open innovation trend (Chesbrough, 2003).”
A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (Strategic) management perspective (2019, methodology): “The discussion has progressed from standard technology transfer issues (licensing, technology assistance agreements, etc.) to using the SECI process (Nonaka, 1991) and ‘open innovation’ (Chesbrough, 2003), while not forgetting traditional internal development through corporate R&D.”
Process Innovation: Open Innovation and the Moderating Role of the Motivation to Achieve Legitimacy (2018, background): “Open Innovation Open innovation initiatives aim to facilitate the use of external sources of ideas as an organization looks to advance its technological and knowledge capabilities (Chesbrough, 2003b).”