Integrating economic costs into conservation planning.

By R. Naidoo, A. Balmford, Paul J. Ferraro, Stephen Polasky, Taylor H. Ricketts, Mathieu Rouget. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2006

1,106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0d48c78c26e4c00376fd1688c8406a201824ddc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Using return‐on‐investment to guide restoration: a case study from Hawaii (2008, background): “…for discovering these nonlinearities, recognizing that investing strategically requires considering economic and ecological information (Murdoch et al. 2007; Naidoo et al. 2006); and (2) ROI rankings are goaldependent, highlighting the need to specify conservation objectives explicitly (Figure 7).”
Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning (2009, background): “Many costs are associated with conservation planning, including acquisition costs, management costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs (see Naidoo et al. 2006).”
Opportunity costs: Who really pays for conservation? (2010, background): “Economic costs of conservation planning include five main components: acquisition, management, damage, transaction, and opportunity (Naidoo et al., 2006).”
Knowing But Not Doing: Selecting Priority Conservation Areas and the Research–Implementation Gap (2008, background): “For example, conservation assessments should include economic costs of implementation if interventions are to be cost-effective (Naidoo et al. 2006); however, we are far from being able to establish institutional structures that ensure the effective spending of conservation funds in priority areas…”
When payments for environmental services will work for conservation (2013, background): “Nature’s values transcend monetary figures, so the argument normally goes—and if we don’t know what it is worth, how much should we then charge for it? The answer is that payment levels are either negotiated between service buyers and sellers, or if predetermined by service buyers on a take-it-or-le”
Unexpected outcomes of invasive predator control: the importance of evaluating conservation management actions (2012, background): “…for their effectiveness using evidence (for example Smith et al., 2010; St Clair et al., 2011), but few have incorporated management costs (Naidoo et al., 2006) or developed return on investment relationships (but see Montgomery, Brown & Adams, 1994; Wilson et al., 2007; Busch & Cullen,…”
Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned (2009, background): “F or p er so na l u se o nl y. this approach to model agricultural and timber returns across space in conservation and ecosystem service assessments (e.g., Naidoo & Adamowicz 2006; Naidoo & Iwamura 2007; Polasky et al. 2005, 2008; and for a review, see Naidoo et al. 2006).”
Management costs for small protected areas and economies of scale in habitat conservation (2011, background): “The situation offering the greatest efficiency savings in conservation, where sites assigned the greatest ecological priority are also those where conservation costs are lowest (Naidoo et al., 2006), is therefore not achieved for this set of protected areas.”
High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas (2009, background): “Systematic conservation planning [34] is a rapidly growing discipline and is increasingly sophisticated in its incorporation of many factors such as both multiple ecosystem service densities [35] and costs [34,36].”
Is conservation triage just smart decision making? (2008, positive): “If costs are considered in planning, decision makers are aware of the opportunity cost of funds that are directed away from particular conservation actions, leading to greater returns on investment [ 35 ].”
Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica (2012, background): “…has long been a concern in the burgeoning conservation planning literature, which focuses on spatially, and sometimes temporally, optimizing limited conservation resources (e.g., Margules and Pressey 2000; Polasky, Camm, and GarberYonts 2001; Costello and Polasky 2004; Naidoo et al. 2006).”
Conservation planning in a changing world. (2007, background): “Other, barely explored issues include scheduling in relation to varying costs of areas [ 57 ,61] and their availability for conservation action [60,61].”
Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning (2012, background): “Efficiency in the context of spatial prioritisation frequently implies cost efficiency, which can be defined as the ratio of benefits to costs (Pearce & Moran, 1994; Ando et al., 1998; Juutinen & Mönkkönen, 2004; Naidoo et al., 2006; Wilson et al., 2009).”
Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation (2016, background): “Incorporating animal movement into management planning may entail a number of costs , such as the costs of acquiring land and the costs associated with establishing and maintaining a network of managed areas ( Naidoo et al .”
Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies (2011, methodology): “Objectives, purposes and implementation of ESS assessments Generally, ESS are described using quantitative accounting and monetary values for services that ecosystems provide (Costanza et al. 1997; Daily 1997, 2000; Fisher et al. 2009; on a smaller scale: Naidoo et al. (2006)).”
Parks versus PES: Evaluating direct and incentive-based land conservation in Mexico (2017, neutral): “22 For an overview of conceptual issues in assessing conservation costs, see Naidoo et al. 2006.”