When payments for environmental services will work for conservation

By Sven Wunder. 2013

272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80b10a95f6760f890f07bcaf430633b79d95290c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, background): “When these preconditions are not satisfied, PES design — like the design of any other policy — becomes highly complex and often ineffective (Wunder, 2013).”
Effects of Payment for Environmental Services (PES) on Deforestation and Poverty in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review (2014, methodology): “…and poverty reduction goals conflict, how different conservation strategies fare in terms of such trade-offs, and the scope for ‘win-win’ strategies that generate both significant conservation and poverty reduction benefits (Muradian et al., 2013; Sunderlin et al., 2005; Wunder, 2001, 2013).”
Notions of Justice in Payments for Ecosystem Services:Insights from China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program in Yunnan Province (2015, background): “PES schemes commonly reveal clear concerns about justice, at least in principle (Sikor et al., 2013; Wunder, 2013; Sikor et al., 2014).”
The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review (2018, background): “The effectiveness of PES in achieving multiple objectives simultaneously is debatable (Muradian et al., 2013; Wunder, 2013).”
What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program (2014, background): “As with other conservation approaches hat strive to link conservation and development, however, the xtent to which PES can represent a “win-win” for ecological and ocial goals remains a topic of intense debate (Adams et al., 2004; ira and Adams, 2009; Muradian et al., 2010, 2013; Wunder, 2013).”
Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability (2017, background): “PES are also limited as a solution to environmental problems because they are only applicable to relatively rare cases (Wunder, 2013).”
Green economy and carbon markets for conservation and development: a critical view (2016, background): “Middle-sector landholders, with more modest opportunities for profit but with the capacity and inclination to deforest, are seen as the most appropriate PES recipients (Wunder 2007, 2013).”
Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services (2015, background): “Notably, payments go in scope much beyond markets, reflecting an increasing consensus that PES are only exceptionally being realized through markets (Wunder, 2013), and that even the term “market-based” is severely overstretched (Lapeyre and Pirard, 2013).”
The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services (2017, unknown): “Given the sustained interest in PES, much has been written about the potential benefits and pitfalls of payment-based approaches in environmental governance (Muradian et al., 2013; Wunder, 2013).”
Social Equity Matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services (2014, background): “2013, Wunder 2013).”
Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia (2015, background): “A recent review by Wunder (2013) highlighted the importance of taking the ecological-economics perspective (Costanza et al., 1997, 2004; Farber et al., 2002) in analysing the applicability of PES focusing on " the insistence on the importance of equity and the diversity of institutional contexts " .”
Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability (2020, background): “It is clear, however, that voluntary incentive programmes such as payments for ecosystem services are limited in their applicability, and constrained to where sufficient capacity exists (Wunder, 2013).”