Unexpected outcomes of invasive predator control: the importance of evaluating conservation management actions

By J. Walsh, K. Wilson, J. Benshemesh, Hugh P. Possingham. 2012

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f5afa2559ca70d2b1b5e8f4e1f4acef9862d14a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. T. Doherty
2. Euan G. Ritchie
3. N. Yoccoz
4. R. Ims
5. H. Henttonen
6. A. Mysterud
7. T. O'Brien
8. M. Kinnaird

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Euan G. Ritchie
2. N. Yoccoz
3. T. Doherty
4. Love Dalén
5. R. Ims
6. A. Mysterud

Citations in the corpus

• Carnivore conservation in practice: replicated management actions on a large spatial scale (2013, background): “2012), and evaluation of red fox Vulpes vulpes baiting in Australia indicated no effect on abundance of the targeted prey species (Walsh et al. 2012).”
• Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence‐Based Invasive Predator Management (2017, background): “Further, lethal control is often assumed to benefit biodiversity, with little scrutiny of the actual efficacy of such programs (Reddiex et al. 2006; Walsh et al. 2012).”