Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning

By Natalie Ban, C. Klein. 2009

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36d624e648e31758c0d552f742c424819f8895c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Pressey
2. M. Mills
3. J. Cinner
4. Natalie Ban
5. L. McCook
6. J. Claudet
7. G. Almany
8. M. Pratchett

In Global and Planetary Change

1. R. Pressey
2. J. Cinner
3. Natalie Ban
4. V. Adams
5. L. McCook
6. J. Claudet
7. G. Almany
8. J. Jompa

Citations in the corpus

• Designing, implementing and managing marine protected areas: emerging trends and opportunities for coral reef nations (2011, background): “However, to date most of these studies have either assumed that socio-economic costs are uniform or have considered only opportunity costs to fisheries (30 of 42 studies; Ban and Klein, 2009).”
• The rise of large-scale marine protected areas: Conservation or geopolitics? (2013, background): “, 2007), the conservation costs of MPAs (Adams et al., 2010; Balmford et al., 2004; Ban et al., 2011; Ban and Klein, 2009; McCrea-Strub et al., 2011), and the governance analysis of largescale marine areas (Day and Dobbs, 2013; Fidelman et al.”