Using return‐on‐investment to guide restoration: a case study from Hawaii

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver (2009, background): “Conservation and restoration are a key focus today (Manning et al. 2006; Goldstein et al. 2008), as are new remote sensing systems for characterizing biodiversity and ecosystem structure and function at large scales (Asner et al.”
Time, space, place, and the Bonn Challenge global forest restoration target (2017, background): “Indeed, the restoration literature has shown that a landowner’s decision to restore degraded land can depend on the landowner’s ability to financially benefit from the value of ecosystem goods and services (Goldstein et al. 2008; Birch et al. 2010; Schiappacasse et al. 2012).”
Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta‐analysis of Recent Papers (2000–2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals (2010, background): “Finally, there are many other less concrete, but no less important benefits of restoration (Janzen 2002) that should be taken into account when conducting a holistic return-oninvestment assessment of restoration (Goldstein et al. 2008; Jones & Schmitz 2009; inter alia).”