Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation
By Andrew M. Allen, Navinder J. Singh. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2016
379 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A common challenge in species conservation and management is how to incorporate species movements into management objectives. There often is a lack of knowledge of where, when and why species move. The field of movement ecology has grown rapidly in the last decade and is now providing the knowledge needed to incorporate movements of species into management planning. This knowledge can also be used to develop management strategies that are flexible in time and space and may improve the effectiveness of management actions. Therefore, wildlife management and conservation may benefit by strengthening the link with movement ecology. We present a framework that illustrates how animal movement can be used to enhance conservation planning and identify management actions that are complementary to existing strategies. The framework contains five steps that identify (1) the movement attributes of a species, (2) their impacts on ecosystems, (3) how this knowledge can be used to guide the scale and type of management, (4) the implementation, and (5) the evaluation of management actions. We discuss these five steps in detail, highlighting why the step is important and how the information can be obtained. We illustrate the framework through a case study of managing a highly mobile species, the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), a harvested species of conservation concern. We believe that the movement-management framework provides an important, and timely, link between movement ecology and wildlife management and conservation, and highlights the potential for complementary, dynamic solutions for managing wildlife.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7dfeb9e72be8bbc2c92453f5b826c349f203050
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. P. Diasb
- Jonathan A. Greenc
- Herculano Andrade Dinisu
- Justine Dossab
- Jez Blackburnh
- Juan F. Masellod
- Ana P. B. Carneirob
- Brendan J. Godleyk
Citations in the corpus
- Spatial scales of marine conservation management for breeding seabirds (2018, background): “By 2017, more than 100 of the 360 species of seabirds had been equipped with tracking devices [34]; hence, sufficient seabird tracking data exist on the spatial scales of foraging to inform effective management at a broad taxonomic level [6,35,36].”
- Philopatry and Regional Connectivity of the Great Hammerhead Shark, Sphyrna mokarran in the U.S. and Bahamas (2017, neutral): “…species coordinated actions by many nations, international organizations, multilateral environmental agreements and industry regulators will be required if their populations are to recover to healthy levels and be safeguarded into the future (Lascelles et al., 2014; Allen and Singh, 2016).”