Entrepreneurship and University Technology Transfer

By Mike Wright, S. Birley, Simon Mosey. 2004

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0d40aacbf46280ad5204beabe01b880df20863a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “Development stages have been defined with reference to start-up date (Clarysse and Moray, 2004), main business activities (Ndonzuau et al., 2002), and critical resources needed (Sine et al., 2003; Wright et al., 2004b).”
Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: a literature survey (2010, background): “University technology transfer is a step-bystep process of commercializing university-developed technology and invention whose success is dependent on the role played by the creator of the intellectual property, the individual scientist or engineer ( Wright et al. 2004 ).”
Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities (2005, background): “Teece et al. (1997) also propose that the past histories of firms make t the f its c its c t the g at l ed b had e ( rs’ d ond ing e ups u le and i thers at generating technology-based spinoff com ies (Shane, 2004a; Wright et al., 2004a; Lockett right, 2004).”
In good company: : The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists (2012, background): “Thus, incidences of success can be powerful forces for work colleagues, providing role models and pointing to the feasibility of commercialization behaviour (Kassicieh et al., 1996, Wright et al., 2004).”
A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development (2010, background): “The significance of university spin-off and start-up ventures as a technology transfer mechanism for generating and sustaining regional economic growth and competitiveness is widely acknowledged (Rogers, 1986; Etzkowitz et al., 2000; Wright et al., 2004).”
The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change - Key strategic challenges (2019, background): “Through regional interaction, entrepreneurial universities promote change that benefits the entire region (Wright et al. 2004; Guerrero et al. 2018).”
Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework (2008, background): “The challenge lies in identifying and replicating the processes that facilitate swift movement of technology from the ivory tower of academia to the front-line of industry (Allen et al. 1979; Allen and Sosa 2004; Birley 2002; Lacetera 2006; Mowery and Shane 2002; Wright et al. 2004a; Markman et al”
Dynamics of Science-based entrepreneurship (2010, background): “Extensive studies have analyzed the institutional and other influences on the creation of SBEFs (for reviews see for example, Mustar et al. 2006; Rothermael et al. 2007; Siegel et al. 2007), and numerous special issues have been devoted to entrepreneurship and university technology transfer (e.g. W”