Mechanically Activated Integrin Switch Controls α5β1 Function
By J. Friedland, Mark H. Lee, D. Boettiger. Science, 2009
679 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cell Biology, Immunology and Allergy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0ae4d4c3fcf3678f54f5b25b30db075ca239099
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
In Cell Biology
In Immunology and Allergy
Citations in the corpus
- Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction (2011, neutral): “Proteins within the focal adhesion, including the integrins themselve”
- Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression (2010, background): “Several important molecular players have emerged, including integrins (Paszek et al., 2005; Friedland et al., 2009), focal adhesion proteins such as FAK (Pelham and Wang, 1997; Paszek et al., 2005; Assoian and Klein, 2008), and cytoskeletal tension driven by the action of myosin II (Engler et al.,…”
- Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand (2009, background): “It has recently been proposed that the FN–51 bond can be switched from a relaxed to the tensioned states in response to mechanical force through engaging the synergy site in FN (Friedland et al., 2009).”
- Assembly of Fibronectin Extracellular Matrix (2010, background): “N IH -PA Author M anuscript N IH -PA Author M anuscript N IH -PA Author M anuscript (Friedland et al. 2009).”
- Mechanical Integration of Actin and Adhesion Dynamics in Cell Migration (2010, background): “In addition, tension on ECM-engaged integrins promotes β1 integrin head binding to synergy sites on fibronectin (Friedland et al. 2009).”
- Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. (2010, background): “Also, the presence or absence of specific ECM domains can dramatically influence not only cell adhesion strength (Friedland et al., 2009) but also differentiation (Helen et al., unpublished; Martino et al., 2009; Rowlands et al., 2008; Yasunaga et al., 2005) via conformational changes that enhance…”
- Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration (2009, neutral): “The second hypothesis is that NM II-generated force induces conformational changes that expose cryptic binding or activation sites in key adhesion component”
- Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension (2010, background): “Recently, α5β1 integrin was reported to undergo a conformational change in response to myosin II-generated cytoskeletal force, suggesting that this force, combined with ECM stiffness, triggers an integrin switch that is required to generate signals through the adhesion comple”
- The extracellular matrix at a glance (2010, background): “Indeed, ‘tensed’ FN modulates the catch bond ‘force-activation’ and adhesion assembly of 51-integrin through exposure of its synergy site (Friedland et al., 2009).”
- The myofibroblast: paradigm for a mechanically active cell. (2010, background): “Inhibition of either cell contractile activity or reducing extracellular resistance by growth on soft substrates both suppress the integrin high adhesion switch (Friedland et al., 2009).”
- Integrins in cell migration. (2011, background): “Tension-sensitive molecules include Cas, talin, fibronectin, and integrin (Zhong et al. 1998; Sawada et al. 2006; del Rio et al. 2009; Friedland et al. 2009).”
- Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction (2011, neutral): “Other crucial linkages in mechanotransduction, such as fibronectin–integrin (α 5 β 1 integrin”