Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition

By Paul Thagard. 2006

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f02f50541fd43a24aa04c40203468f6f922c81ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education (2011, background): “…likely not productive to consider all possible statistical dependencies, but if a plausible argument can be made that a particular dependency is strong and important, then an alternative to an independence model should be considered. weight to things one cares about (Thagard, 2006; Walton, 1992).”
CREATIVE COMBINATION OF REPRESENTATIONS: SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY AND TECHNOLOGICAL INVENTION (2010, background): “This discrepancy may reflect the fact that Philbin had many more early examples than Haven, including 10 inventions before the Christian era in contrast to only 1 discovery that early.”
Special Thematic Section on "Societal Change" A Complex Systems Approach to the Study of Ideology: Cognitive-Affective Structures and the Dynamics of Belief Systems (2013, background): “…& Ellsworth, 2007; Osgood et al., 1975) as special nodes that are highly interconnected with beliefs and concepts, thus modeling the crucial role of emotion in human decision-making and action (Schröder & Thagard, 2013a; Thagard, 2006; see also the section on cognitive-affective mapping below).”
On the Goals of Epistemic Education: Promoting Apt Epistemic Performance (2018, background): “Drawing on analyses of the central, productive role played by emotions such as curiosity, hope, and excitement in the work of scientists, Thagard (2006) argued that education should seek to foster these emotions.”
Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model (2011, background): “What is further posited in the MASRL model is that affect impacts cognition directly; for example, positive or negative affect may enhance holistic or analytic processing modes, respectively (Kuhl, 2001; see also “hot thought” by Thagard, 2006).”