The Trouble with Rubrics
By A. Kohn. 2006
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f026c0df8ad5a7a802c6965535a75d1abc3ec2a8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Heidi L. Andrade
- Ying Du
- Ernesto Panadero
- Xiaolei Wang
- Zi Yan
- A. Jonsson
- Gavin T. L. Brown
- S. Brookhart
Citations in the corpus
- Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing (2010, unknown): “One group has studied the objectivity of rubrics (Breland, 1983; Coffman, 1971; McColly, 1970; Spandel, 2006; Wolfe, 1997), and another group has claimed they are overly reductive (Flower & Hayes, 1981; Kohn, 2006; Mabry, 1999; Pula & Huot, 1993).”
- Putting Rubrics to the Test: The Effect of a Model, Criteria Generation, and Rubric‐Referenced Self‐Assessment on Elementary School Students' Writing (2008, result): “We also note that the finding regarding the effect of treatment on criteria such as voice, or ideas and content, stands as a rejoinder to recent critiques of rubrics (Kohn, 2006; Wilson, 2006).”