Differential Susceptibility to Rearing Influence: An Evolutionary Hypothesis and Some Evidence.

By J. Belsky. 2005

442 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0008c81184b7ea85a21e6a6cae27266c1b24d5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Parasites, Behavioral Defenses, and the Social Psychological Mechanisms Through Which Cultures Are Evoked (2006, methodology): “The human brain has been designed by natural selection to take advantage of this bonanza of data (e.g., Alexander, 1987; Belsky, 2005; Bjorklund & Pellegrini, 2002; Flinn, 2006; Tooby & Cosmides, 1992).”
Sex Differences in Attachment Emerge in Middle Childhood: An Evolutionary Hypothesis (2010, background): “…has evolutionary biology addressed issues central to child development, most notably concerning plasticity and genotype–environment interactions (Belsky, 1997b, 2005; Belsky & Pluess, 2009; Boyce & Ellis, 2005; Wolf, van Doorn, & Weissing, 2008); indeed, the study of organismic development is…”
Differential Susceptibility to Environmental Influences (2013, background): “latter being highly malleable and the former hardly at all? Boyce and Ellis (2005) contend that a general psychobiological reac tivity makes some children especially vulnerable to stress and thus to general health problems.”
Do Overwhelmed Expatriates Intend to Leave? The Effects of Sensory Processing Sensitivity, Stress, and Social Capital on Expatriates' Turnover Intention (2018, background): “Belsky’s differential susceptibility theory (Belsky, 1997, 2005; Belsky et al., 2007; Belsky and Pluess, 2009, 2013; Ellis et al., 2011) suggests individual differences in their environmental sensitivity.”
Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. (2009, background): “, plasticity) for evolutionarybiological reasons (Belsky, 1997a, 2005), it does not predict that more negatively emotional children or those with difficult temperament would prove especially malleable; this was an empirical observation (Belsky, 2005).”
For Better and For Worse (2007, background): “…are more susceptible both to a wide variety of rearing influences and with respect to a wide variety of developmental outcomes—as is presumed in the use of concepts like ‘‘fixed’’ and ‘‘plastic’’ strategists (Belsky, 2005), with the latter being highly malleable and the former hardly at all?”
The Evolutionary Basis of Sex Differences in Parenting and Its Relationship with Child Anxiety in Western Societies (2013, background): “In particular, it has been hypothesized that parenting affects emotionally reactive children to a larger extent than other children (Belsky, 2005).”
Gene-environment interplay and psychopathology: multiple varieties but real effects. (2006, background): “That is, high reactivity phenotypes might be disproportionately found in both highly stressful and highly protected early social environments (Belsky, 2005: Boyce & Ellis, 2005; Ellis, Essex, & Boyce, 2005).”
Nature and Nurturing: Parenting in the Context of Child Temperament (2011, background): “…University of Washington, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195, USA e-mail: liliana@u.washington.edu parenting on adjustment, suggesting that children’s responsiveness or sensitivity to parenting may vary depending on individual differences in emotionality and self-regulation (Belsky 2005; Wachs 1991).”
The juvenile transition: A developmental switch point in human life history (2009, unknown): “Also working from an evolutionary perspective, Belsky (1997, 2000, 2005); see also Belsky, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & van Ijzendoorn, 2007) argued that it may be adaptive for individuals to differ in their degree of susceptibility to the rearing environment.”
Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory (2011, background): “…to context theory (BSCT; Boyce et al., 1995; Boyce & Ellis, 2005; Ellis, Essex, & Boyce, 2005) and differential susceptibility theory (DST; Belsky, 1997a, 1997b, 2005; Belsky, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & van IJzendoorn, 2007).1 With a central focus on Person Environment interactions, both…”
Precursors of attachment security (2018, background): “…negatively emotional infants/toddlers may be especially susceptible to rearing influence, especially with regard to developmental outcomes related to self-control and socioemotional development (for a review, see Belsky, 2005c); this is also true in the case of studies of parenting and attachment.”
Linking Maternal Warmth and Responsiveness to Children's Self‐regulation (2011, background): “As a result, a child is more or less susceptible to parent behaviors (Belsky, 2005).”
The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2010, unknown): “…susceptibility underlies pervasive person-by-environment interactions, whereby individuals with given genotypes or phenotypes show higher sensitivity to environmentally induced effects on development (see Belsky, 1997, 2005; Belsky and Pluess, 2009; Boyce and Ellis, 2005; Ellis et al., 2011a).”