Gene-environment interplay and psychopathology: multiple varieties but real effects.
By Michael Rutter, Terrie E. Moffitt, Avshalom Caspi. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 2006
1,051 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05bf87ea42243e17344abb3b499d4d23e6d389b1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Michael Rutter
- Edmund Sonuga-Barke
- L. Hosak
- J. van Os
- B. Rutten
- Christine Marcelle Heim
- G. Koob
- C. Nemeroff
In Genetics
Citations in the corpus
- A review of 25 years of research in bidirectionality in parent–child relationships (2016, result): “Their results support a ‘‘dual-risk’’ hypothesis, yet they discuss the possibility of an rGE (Rutter, 2007; Rutter et al., 2006).”
- Genetics of the Human Personality (2010, background): “Gene-environment interplay Gene-environment interplay is a general term that covers several divergent concepts (Rutter et al 2006).”
- Etiologic Subtypes of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Brain Imaging, Molecular Genetic and Environmental Factors and the Dopamine Hypothesis (2007, methodology): “The use of these methods may be essential for the serious assessment of gene-environment interactions and correlations (see Rutter et al., 2006).”
- Building a framework for global surveillance of the public health implications of adverse childhood experiences. (2010, background): “The complex interplay of gene–environment interactions has been reviewed by an earlier study.(47) It concluded that the effects of genes and environments are not as separate as was once supposed and epigenetic effects, through influences on gene expression, canmoderate the effects of genes in import”
- Gene-environment interactions in schizophrenia: review of epidemiological findings and future directions. (2008, background): “Further, some theorists now suggest that (1) additive, noninteractive genetic effects may be less common than previously assumed (cf Colhoun et al(24)); (2) studying genes in isolation from known environmental risks may fail to detect important genetic influences; and (3) traditional notions of mult”
- Effects of profound early institutional deprivation: An overview of findings from a UK longitudinal study of Romanian adoptees (2007, methodology): “This was strongly evident in the findings at age 4 and 6 years (O’Connor, Bredenkamp, Rutter, & the English and Romanian Adoptees Study Team, 1999; O’Connor, Rutter, & the English and Romanian Adoptees Study Team, 2000) and was equally striking at age 11 (Rutter et al., 2006a).”
- Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: the early years (2014, background): “Another model of gene– environment interactions, known as the “diathesis-stress” model, predicts that genetic influence will instead be stronger in disadvantaged environments (Pennington et al. 2009; Rutter, Moffitt, and Caspi 2006).”
- Widening participation in higher education: analysis using linked administrative data (2008, background): “There is growing recognition that gene– environment interactions are such that attempting to isolate the separate effects of genetic and environmental factors is fruitless ( Rutter, Moffitt and Caspi, 2006 ).”