Changing the Agenda for Research into Students' Views about University Teaching: Four shortcomings of SRT research

By Angela R. Penny. 2003

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Education, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efae3134a3ea3f2e433225827c6c923fac9a999c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Bert Brockx
2. D. Mortelmans
3. P. Spooren

In Education

1. Bert Brockx
2. D. Mortelmans
3. P. Spooren
4. H. Hornstein
5. M. Goos
6. A. Salomons

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Bert Brockx
2. D. Mortelmans
3. P. Spooren

Citations in the corpus

• Teacher professionalism and student evaluation of teaching: will better teachers receive higher ratings and will better students give higher ratings? (2006, background): “It is certain that most researchers believe that the results of student ratings provide evaluators with valid, reliable and valuable data concerning the quality and effectiveness of teaching (Penny, 2003).”
• On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “This widespread use is largely due to the apparent ease of collecting the data and presenting and interpreting the results (Penny, 2003).”