Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system.

By Antonius H. N. Cillessen, W. Bukowski. 2000

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eeb4ca2100f36e0f39f1bba934ea84e3aaf8c0b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Stability of Psychopathic Characteristics in Childhood (2008, methodology): “Children in each target child’s classroom completed a sociometric survey as a group following an “unlimited” nomination procedure (Terry, 2000).”
Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender (2008, background): “Researchers should continue to advance sociometric technologies that will allow the structure and dynamics of children’s social environments to be represented more completely (Bukowski & Cillessen, 1998; Cillessen & Bukowski, 2000).”
Bullies and Victims in the Peer Ecology: Four Questions for Psychologists and School Professionals (2003, background): “Modern research-based sociometric technologies are increasingly advanced, relatively unobtrusive, objective, informative for participants, and sensitive to ethical issues (Cillessen & Bukowski, 2000; Rodkin, 2003).”
What aspects of peer relationships are impaired in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? (2005, background): “Cillessen and Bukowski (2000) noted the following: . . . Moreno's [1934] sociometry was bilateral.”
Stability and Change in Peer Relationships During the Transition to Middle-Level School (2002, background): “As noted by Terry (2000), the criterion of friendship might be used in differing ways at different times or by differing people, whereas the criterion of liking might be more consistent over raters and time because liking is more unidimensional than friendship.”
Relational and Physical Aggression of Preschool-Age Children: Peer Status Linkages Across Informants (2005, background): “Sociometric assessments have long proven useful as a measure and descriptor of children’s peer status (Cillessen & Bukowski, 2000; Hymel, Vaillancourt, McDougall, & Renshaw, 2002; Parker, Rubin, Price, & DeRosier, 1995).”