Online Student Ratings: Will Students Respond?.

By Trav D. Johnson. 2002

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed81ca3142e3fb3d0896659901ff40b9163066b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. D. F. Curtis
2. Bert Brockx
3. D. Mortelmans
4. Tena B. Crews
5. P. Spooren
6. H. Hornstein
7. M. Goos
8. A. Salomons

Citations in the corpus

• On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “Nevertheless, administrators have challenged the validity of SET based on limited psychometric knowledge (Franklin, 2001; Sproule, 2000; Wolfer & Johnson, 2003).”
• Online Course Evaluations: Faculty Perspective and Strategies for Improved Response Rates (2011, background): “Johnson ( 2002 ) compiled response rates for online course evaluations over a period of three years.”
• Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor? (2008, background): “…conclude that with acceptance of online ratings by students and faculty, appreciation of the advantages of online ratings (thoughtful feedback, convenience and user-friendliness) and the development of online infrastructure, this response difference will diminish (Ballantyne 2003; Johnson 2003).”